Medicare. For. All.

Sorry, you are barking up a dead tree. No program that is controlled by our Central Government can be trusted to
take care of the health of Americans, ever!

At least not until We the People have regained control of our government and have a firm grip on keeping control.

You have seen how schools that refuse to comply with “the government’s” dictate that all will comply therewith and
allow LGBTs to use whatever bathroom that they deem to associate with their chosen orientation and not their
physical identity. Immediately threats came forth to force compliance or loose Federal funding for schools.

Do you want to see a government like our wherein no-one has the guts to speak out against any sort of program the
president spits forth, no matter what it is or how much it threatens the very Constitution founding our country and
containing the dictates for its operation, as it was written and has been legally amended in accordance with Article V,
thereof.

There could be a single system for caring for all American Citizens only, organized by all of the States and controlled
by all of the States working together and following the rules to which they have all agreed. Like a Health Constitution.
Each State would run/administer its portion of the responsibility in according to the rules to which it has agreed.

A central finance center would have to be established operated by members from each State each having equal
voice in operating decisions. All final actions to be approved by a National Vote to be held every other year as
part of the ballot through which seats vacated in our Federal Government are filled.

Members of the Central Finance Center would be connected electronically and the representatives for each State
would work from their respective States offices using computers resources to do their work. Meetings would be
held by video conference calls as often as necessary for smooth operation.

States would have some oversight but no decision making authority or ability to handle financial matters. The
monies for the health program would not be part of any State’s budget. Each State would collect the funds
from its citizens and then pass them on to the State’s Health Program Office. The cost associated with the
collection of funds to be written off as operating expenses. No reimbursements to be made from Healthcare
monies. The people from each State working for the Healthcare System to be paid by their respective States
but not from the Healthcare resources.

All claims would come from State citizens to the state offices for review, approval and payment.

A schedule of acceptable fees based on identified services provided would have to be created so that doctors
get a fair fee for the services they provide. The Schedule of Fees would be negotiated with doctors from all
genre of care and once set, would remain fixed until new rates could be negotiated based on verifiable justification
for the increase, or decrease.

Since everyone is to be covered everyone will have to pay into the system including those on the public dole.
Each support check will have a set amount deducted for healthcare expenses with limits assigned on the number
of doctor’s visits a person can claim each month. Excess visits will cause an increase in contributions from the
next months support check. No emergency room visits permitted for non-emergency treatment.

Those able to pay will have a fixed rate to pay. Rates will be established by income levels established from
State Income Tax Records for those States with an income tax and from Federal Income Tax Records for those
of States that do not. Payments not to exceed a percentage of income after taxes to be established by State
Healthcare panels taking into consideration all conditions affecting incomes in their particular State.

Should there be an excess of funds collected they will not be distributed to the States or Central Government.
Should excesses accrue for three years the excess from the first of the three years will be given back to the
people based on the amount they paid in. If excess continues to accrue the process of reimbursement will
continue so that only two years of excesses will remain on hand at a time. These funds to be used in the
event a sudden and unexpected demand for healthcare should take place.

The system will have its up and downs until operations are fine tuned under actual use. Then all should
work well without government interference or control.

Sounds good to me!

Joseph D. Hollinger
God Bless America,
My Country tis of Thee!

On 5/22/2016 5:34 PM, Robert wrote:

Joseph D.,

It won’t even take a minute.

Add your name now if you agree that America should move toward single-payer, Medicare for All, universal health coverage.

See our previous alert, copied below in case you missed it, for more information.

Thanks,

Robert Weissman
President, Public Citizen

Update from Public Citizen

Joseph D.,

Fifty-eight percent.

That’s how many Americans — according to a just-released Gallup poll — would prefer to replace our current health insurance system “with a federally funded healthcare program providing insurance for all Americans.”

Including four out of ten Republicans!

For comparison, if a president gets more than 58% of the vote — which only Warren Harding (1920), Franklin Roosevelt (1936), Lyndon Johnson (1964), Richard Nixon (1972) and Ronald Reagan (1984) have managed — it is considered a landslide.

In other words, Americans agree that our country must — like every other wealthy nation on Earth — guarantee health care to ALL of its citizens.

Sign the petition: We the People demand and deserve single-payer, Medicare for All, universal health coverage.

Perhaps even more telling, the Gallup poll revealed that only 22% of Americans would want to repeal Affordable Care Act and NOT replace it with single-payer, Medicare for All, universal coverage.

This is a moral imperative.

And the time is NOW.

– The Entire Team at Public Citizen

© 2016 Public Citizen • 1600 20th Street, NW / Washington, D.C. 20009 • unsubscribe

=’2569256089′>

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

You won’t believe what George Washington said about a Convention of States

Thank you for the links to additional information on single-issue conventions. I will visit each and learn.
I appreciate your taking the time to send me those links. Keep up your work and dedication to an issue you
you favor so much.

The thing that bothers me is the lack of truthfulness evidenced in those now serving in our country under the guise of
serving the People. Corruption is so rampant and the disregard for the Constitution as it was written is run amok and
it is unsafe to expect any of them to follow the rules or the law, including the Supreme Court.

Concerning term limits, the safest way to limit terms is to promote the idea that We the People can control terms at
the ballot box by enforcing the Constitution, the Law, and not allowing anyone to serve more time than that provided
for them to serve by the Framers. The Framers knew well that people left in office too long would fall to the unguarded
temptations to which they are continuously exposed, that have no penalties for abuse.

Article I. Section 2. says that Members (that means all of them) shall be chosen by the People of the several States
every second Year. That clearly means all Members are to be new every second year to serve in the “People’s House.”

Article I. Section 3. says that each State shall have two Senators, chosen by the People thereof, for six years, …. That
clearly means each Senator shall serve for six years and return to their home and take up the life they left in order
to serve.

Article II. Section 1. Establishes the Executive position for the United States of America in a President, and a Vice-President
elected for the same Term. The most powerful sentence in the Constitution (my opinion) comes next. This sentence
establishes that no woman is to be President and that a President shall serve for four years only.

“He shall hold his Office for the Term of four Years, ….” “He shall hold his” cannot mean anything but only a man can
be President of the U.S.. There is nothing in those words that can be bent or twisted enough to find a her. We must
remember that at the time the Framers did their work, women did not participate publicly. They had far too much
responsibilities at home. This was normal for those times and accepted by most. Discrimination was not invented, yet.
Thus, it was normal not to consider their taking part or wanting to do so.

Until there is an Article V. amendment ratified by three-fourths of the States without changes, that affords women equal
status with men for holding public offices, women cannot hold public offices anywhere. Allowing them to do so,
continue to do so, is unconstitutional. We all have been empowered with the duty for preserving, protecting and
defending the Constitution from all enemies, both foreign and domestic. We have both now.

The rest of the sentence from Article II. Section 1. “Office for the Term of four Years, ….” clearly means that “the Term”
is singular and means “one term” of four Years. Thus, we have propagandized into believing that a President can
serve two four-year terms. The propaganda is supported by the 22nd Amendment which provides that a President
can serve only two terms. You will notice that limiting service to two terms also allows service for two terms.

The 22nd Amendment must be repealed because it means nothing. It does not change or reference Article II. Section 1.
which establishes how long a President shall serve. Thus, the 22nd Amendment should be null and void.

Have a great day!

On 5/18/2016 2:56 PM, info wrote:

We are calling for what’s called a “single-issue” convention. Our convention will be called for the sole purpose of limiting the power of the federal government and the federal debt. That means that individuals such as this will be unable to abolish parts or mandates of the constitution, or propose amendments that are not advisable. Here is a link to a document which explains what a single-issue convention is: https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/conventionofstates/pages/899/attachments/original/1423177477/Kelly__Single_Subject_Convention.pdf?1423177477

Additionally, here is a link to a page that explains why single-subject conventions are so safe and cannot be used to allow other agendas to take over the constitution: http://www.conventionofstates.com/is_a_convention_of_the_states_safe

Joshua Kavanagh
COSAction.com
Donate

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

You won’t believe what George Washington said about a Convention of States

Mark Meckler,

Read this article and you will see why a Convention of the States is not a good idea at this time in our history.

Wednesday, 15 January 2014

Socialists and Soros Fight for Article V Convention

Written by Joe Wolverton, II, J.D.

(http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/17402-socialists-and-soros-fight-for-article-v-convention)

Soros and his 45+ organizations that he funds in opposition to our Capitalism want us to open a Constitutional
Convention that will allow them to attempt amendment and advance their agenda.

Soros and his ilk think “Nullification” of US mandates is the way to go.

I suggest that you read the above article and do some research concerning “who wants a Constitutional Convention?”

I still hold that we are endangering our country by attempting an Article V amendment at this time.

Good things come to those that wait. Let’s wait.

Joe Hollinger
God Bless America!

On 5/17/2016 4:45 PM, Mark Meckler wrote:

You won’t believe what George Washington said about a Convention of States

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Vet Congressman: Obama lied, media is covering for him

Nathanial,

Since Mr. De Santis is a strict constitutionalist, he should know that the Constitution contains term limits for
members of the House, the Senate and the President/Vice-President. It appears that no-one chooses to
follow the dictates the Framers included concerning how long a person is to serve.

The Constitution and the laws that existed prior to its ratification are not suggestions for the operation
of our country and the People’s government, they are hard and fast orders that must be followed to the
letter, without exception, modification or interpretation. These orders, that we accepted when the States
ratified the Constitution, are as cast in stone and can only be changed by amendment using the processes
exactly as spelled out in Article V.

Article I. Sections 2. and 3. contain the limited amounts of time to be served by Members of the House
and Senators. Article II. Section 1. sets the time that a president is to serve “the Term of four Years” not
two terms. It also shows that only a man can be President “He shall hold his Office”. That means, in
effect that no woman is to be President, Vice-President, or hold any other public office until an Article V.
amendment gives women equal status with men for holding public office. Women did nothing outside
the home at the time the Constitution was framed.

The following Preface shows that the document following it was written for boys at a much later date.
No matter what has happened in the past repeatedly doing something wrong does not make it right.
Reparations must be made when the wrong is discovered. Now is that time. Following these Articles
to the letter and following the rules of grammar that must be used in a document as important as the
Constitution, the basis for our System of Laws. The use of the word “shall” is an order cast in stone.
Words that define numbers, time, etc. must be taken as written. The Supreme Court does not have
the duty or authority to interpret the Framer’s words as they claim. Nothing in the Constitution gives
them the right to interpret. Interpretation is to change something to agree with the mind of the
interpreter. Since no-one is living that took part in the framing there is no way to prove the
interpretations do not change the Framers orders without an Article V. amendment.

The following paragraphs are the Preface from “Elementary Catechism on the Constitution” by Arthur J.
Stansbury. Originally published in 1828. I hope you will read this and understand the manner in which
the Constitution was written in order that all who read it will have no trouble comprehending the
Framers dictates.
(http://thefederalistpapers.integratedmarket.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Elementary-
Catechism-of-the-Constitution.pdf)

Have a great day. Sorry to pour water on your reelection plans but, reelections are unconstitutional.
The fastest way to start America’s return to the Constitution is for no-one to be reelected to any office
every again. The Framers new well the weaknesses of men exposed, over time, to unguarded temptations
for which there are not penalties for abuse. That once men have taken advantage of those temptations,
the gains therefrom would become their master and they would serve nothing else. In case you haven’t
looked, everyone in all three branches of our government has succumbed.

Joseph D. Hollinger
God Bless America,
My Country tis of Thee!

On 5/17/2016 9:21 AM, N. Jones wrote:

Veteran Ron DeSantis is running for Florida Senate to replace Marco Rubio. He is calling out Obama’s lies about the Iran deal because he served on the frontlines and watched his fellow soldiers die at the hands of Iranian militias. We must support him and elect a proud conservative in Florida.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Just sayin…

Trump is the best man left to do the job. Here is one reason. He is a
negotiator.

On 5/16/2016 7:36 PM, LOWELL wrote:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

We need your help right away for this urgent call to action to fight a Constitutional Convention..

Know what? I think you either don’t know what you are doing, or, you do know what you are doing and you are trying to double-speak us into believing there is no danger in convening a Constitutional Convention.

What in God’s Name makes you think anyone will obey new amendments if they do get ratified and become binding on Americans? No-one obeys any laws they don’t want to obey and nothing is done about it now.

In fact, there are probably millions of laws enacted that do not contain funding and support for enforcement. Thus, the law is not worth the papaer it is printed upon.

This is exactly what you are willing to risk our Constitution for in order to get toothless amendments with now enforcement provisions or finances to empower them if there were any.

Have you reviewed the “requirements” that “shall” be met in order to amend the Constitution? They are many and they are constructed to force the amendment process to be long and burdensome and to meet with many restarts of the processes until such time as a consensus of three-fourths of the States can be achieved without anyone changing anything about the proposed amendment.

If one state makes a change in the proposed amendment as it is passing through towards ratification the entire process must start over again, and continue to do so until it passes through with no changes. But, ratification does not a binding amendment make. Most time there are time specifications included in the verbiage and all of those have to be met after ratification before the amendment can become binding. These processes could take years and meet with many, many failures along the way.

It would be far simpler to just encourage everyone to not reelect anyone at any time and protect the Constitution by doing so.

We must get rid of everyone currently in office and install new people that know they are to serve for one term and go back home

Wake up and smell the roses and do things the simple way. The KISS principle is the best way.

Joseph D. Hollinger
God Bless America!

On 5/11/2016 2:25 PM, The Convention of States Missouri Team wrote:

We need your help right away for this urgent call to action.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

ADV: Action Alert: Term Limits

I don’t think your patriotism is on the right foot, Adam. All we have to do is enforce the term limits the Framers included in the Constitution.

Article I. Section 2.: Members of the House shall be chosen every second year. “Members” is all inclusive. No reelections provided for. Do Not Reelect any member of the House.

Article I. Sections 3.: Each State shall have two Senators, elected by the People thereof for six years. That is six years only. No reelections provided for.

Article II. Section 1.: Concerning a president and vice president: “He shall hold his Office for the Term of four Years, ….” This is a very powerful order from the Framers. “He shall hold his Office” clearly shows that only a man can be President. No Article V. amendment has been ratified to give women equal status with men. To vote, yes. Equal status, no. The rest of that sentence: “for the Term of four Years, ….”, tells us that “the Term” is one term and that its length shall be four Years. No reelections provided for.

All we have to do is preserve, protect and defend the Constitution from all enemies, both foreign and “domestic” by simply not voting to reelect anyone.

Our only other recourse is a bloody revolution. A constitutional convention is too risky with the current people in office. A ConCon could destroy the entire Constitution if the wrong people should gain control of the process.

Do Not Reelect Anyone, ever again! Is the sane and legal way to enforce term limits.

Joseph D. Hollinger
God Bless America!

On 5/10/2016 2:30 PM, Adam Brandon – FreedomWorks wrote:

FreedomWorks

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

ADV: The feds follow a different Constitution… here’s how

Mark Meckler, cosaction.com,

I sincerely take exception to your efforts to convene a Constitutional Convention in order to impose term limits on politicians. Bad idea when the Constitution, as it was written and legally amended using the processes in Article V. thereof, the only way that the Constitution can be changed, already contains specific periods of time members of the Legislative Branch and Executive Branch are to serve.

A document having the importance and purpose of founding our country and establishing the rules for managing the People’s government cannot be treated as a living document to be kept up to date with the times. In fact, it is the basis of our system of laws and as such cannot be changed in any way other than that method included within the document for doing so.

The Framers established the processes in Article V. to be very long and difficult to accomplish for a reason. That reason is what you see our run amok government doing to day; making willy-nilly changes for momentary political agenda that increase the risk of tyranny by our own government.

All of the changes you mentioned are illegal and no-one in the Executive Branch, the Legislative Branch, or the Judicial Branch has the power given them by the Framers, to change the Constitution. Not by executive order, decree, or other action resulting in a change; not by legislative action that will cause changes now or as a consequence of some other action, and, the Supreme Court claims it is responsible for interpreting the Framer’s words. It is not! Nowhere in the Constitution is the Supreme Court given any such power or duty. It has decided it has to have that power in order to support political agenda and special interests.

The Constitution, being our founding document, and, the very foundation of our System of Laws, cannot be changed from the original because to do so would alter any and all legal decisions and rulings that were made prior to a change and make all decisions and opinions during that time concerning the same parts of the Constitution, null and void and in need or retrial.

The original Constitution is the document that rules, nothing else is legal no matter what our corrupt and legislating from the bench (unconstitutional) Supreme Court says or rules. Their interpretations are illegal and non-binding on Americans. Their duty is to apply the original demands of the Framers as they are written in plain English using the rules of grammar. They are to test the conditions and facts in each case against what was originally written and determine if the acts being tried have, or have not violated the Constitution. No more.

Nullification applies to all unconstitutional acts by government. We do not have to obey unconstitutional ruling and demands. It is our duty to nullify them and refuse to obey, enforcing the rule of law and pulling the errant branch of our government back to the Constitution.

We the People are responsible for managing our government and keeping it on track with the Constitution as it was written and legally amended. Up until this time we have been negligent in our duties and allowed politicians to run rough shod over the intent of the Framers.

We can do that with bloodshed as the Framers predicted that we would have to do so someday because of the weaknesses of man when exposed to unprotected temptations, over time, with no penalties for abuses. They would come to think they are omnipotent and deserving of holding their high office for ever. That they were meant to rule over the rest of the people and deserving because of their station in life. HELLO, we are there. Those in government will do ANYTHING to keep being reelected and continuing their self-serving behavior, ignoring the People and their Oath of Office.

Therein lies our only course of action. WE MUST EXACT TERM LIMITS AT THE BALLOT BOX. WE MUST NOT REELECT ANYONE EVER AGAIN as the Framers intended in their orders that only the lengths of service they specified are to be served and no more. If we do not reelect anyone we will end the rein of the abusers that have been in office far longer than one term and start with new people that know they are serving but one term from the getgo. We will have two classes of Senators to vote out of office over the next four years and then we will have everyone serving one term and not worrying about reelection. That in itself will give us the benefit of people serving us for their entire time in office.

Article I. Section 2. orders that “Members” of the House “shall” be chosen every second year – period! No reelections permitted.

Article I. Section 3. orders that each State shall have two Senators, chosen by the People thereof, for six years – period! No reelections permitted.

Article II. Section 1. includes one very powerful sentence concerning a President and his service that tells us a lot.
“He shall hold his Office for the Term of four Years, ….” “He shall hold his Office” tells us that a President “shall” be a man only. The rest of the sentence: “for the Term of four Years, ….” clearly states that a President is to serve one Term (the Term) and that its length shall be four Years and no more.

The 22nd Amendment was a clever attempt at allowing a President to serve two terms of four years as well as limiting him to two terms of four years. You cannot limit what you don’t have. The 22nd Amendment fails to mention or change Article II. Section 1. making the amendment null and void.

Please do not pursue a Constitutional Convention to amend the Constitution to fix what is already there. Instead, advocate that no-one votes to reelect anyone and explain the dangers in voting a party ticket. Most important, people must vote for the best candidates regardless of party affiliation.

Please change your direction and lets set term limits the easy way.

Joseph D. Hollinger
God Bless America!

On 5/10/2016 8:03 PM, Mark Meckler wrote:

The feds follow a different Constitution… here’s how

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

URGENT!!!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

ADV: mercy

Healthcare is not a right! Our rights come from our Creator and the three most often quoted are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness amongst others.

God, our Creator, created man in his own image that he drew in the sand and into which he breathed life. Thus, man has all the same freedoms as our Creator.

The right to Life means that no-one but the Creator can take your life from you. The right to Liberty means that you shall live free from bondage and be slave to no entity. The right to Pursue Happiness means you are to be happy where you can find opportunities.

These three rights all depend on you doing what needs to be done in order for you to enjoy them. The same applies to all the rights the Creator has bestowed on man through his being created in God’s image.

Nothing is a gift. Nothing is guaranteed. Nothing is for nothing. Nothing is a right to the extent someone else has to do something for you without your contribution to the effort.

My impression is that God makes life difficult for those that do not follow his laws and strive to make the World a better place than it was when you came into it. Those that expect a free ride on the backs of others who work hard to improve their lots in life will have difficult lives for this reason. So will those that choose not to worship God through Jesus Christ and to trust in his wisdom and power for his names sake.

There should be no free rides for healthcare either. One possible exception being those that have been stricken with a life-long illness or disability for which no cure exists. God wants us to be charitable and in the case of those that “cannot” do for themselves should be cared for by those that have the ability to do so. All others must contribute to the cost of their remaining healthy in a manner to be determined or do without.

The Work Projects Administration (WPA) once existed to get public projects work completed. Since we are paying wages for which we get nothing in return having those on the dole do needed work on public projects in return for the money they get would be quite fair. Part of their pay would be healthcare for them and their families.

Those that have “chosen” to be wards of the State should get nothing to support their worthlessness. Those that choose not to find means for supporting their lives must do without. They must also be forbidden from having children which they are likely to never be able to support. Volunteering to go on public assistance for longer than a few months, during which they can prove they were making numerous honest efforts to earn compensation for their personal well being, should not be allowed. Sterilization for those that make the choice to be wards of the public should be required.

Threats of sterilization, ill health, and starvation that will be carried out will offer the deterrent needed to keep people off of the public dole.

The United States is no longer a wealthy country. Thanks to the privately owned bank, the Federal Reserve, part of the World Bank, we are well on the way to becoming insolvent. The dollar was once the currency chosen for commerce around the World. Many countries are leaning towards dumping the dollar and turning to a currency pool. If they do that, our economy will go down the toilet overnight. You won’t be able to buy a loaf of bread for a wheelbarrow full of dollars. IF you could find a loaf of bread to buy, that is.

Obama and his Muslim puppeteer, Valerie Jarrett, want all white Americans destitute and in the minority and insignificant in their own country. Any program that government controls and citizens need becomes a tool for tyranny and control. Healthcare that each person purchases for himself, like it use to be, is the only way to go. IF the government is to control anything they can control the amount insurance companies are allowed to charge and forbid the exclusion of treatments prescribed by a person’s physician for their care.

Wake up Public Citizen, them ain’t roses over yonder, its skunk cabbage painted pink.

Joseph D. Hollinger
God Bless America!

On 5/4/2016 3:04 PM, Public Citizen Team wrote:

Update from Public Citizen

Joseph D.,

The United States is the only wealthy country on Earth that still puts its citizens at the mercy of a private, for-profit health insurance regime.

Every year, that system wastes $400 billion.

Millions of men, women and children can’t go to the doctor when they get sick.

And tens of thousands die.

Not because of a medical condition, but because of an insurance condition.

That condition is 100 percent curable — if we work together and refuse to accept the immoral status quo.

And while the Affordable Care Act has provided some relief, let’s not forget that it has also perpetuated the private, for-profit insurance model, providing the industry millions of additional customers and even further consolidating its power.

What we need — what the American people deserve — is single-payer, Medicare-for-All universal health coverage.

That’s something Public Citizen has been fighting for. For decades. Literally.

In fact, taking on what some deem “impossible” — then doing the painstaking, thankless, behind-the-scenes work, year after year after year, to ultimately win where others were afraid to fight at all — is our specialty.

  • We will block any and all attempts — from the left or the right — to compromise, privatize or voucherize Medicare, the most successful social program in our nation’s history.
  • We will continue working in Congress, in the courts and in the states to advance single-payer, Medicare-for-All.
  • We will bring to bear the full force of Public Citizen’s 45-years-and-counting policy and political expertise — along with our 400,000 members and supporters nationwide — to once and for all recognize that health care is a right.

One more time:

Health. Care. Is. A. Right.

Donate now to help us keep fighting.

Anything you contribute today will be matched dollar-for-dollar.

This is not impossible.

It is imperative.

– The Entire Team at Public Citizen

P.S. If you’ve donated recently, thank you for supporting this shared project called Public Citizen. Everybody in, nobody out!

© 2016 Public Citizen • 1600 20th Street, NW / Washington, D.C. 20009 • unsubscribe

=’2563651959′>

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment