Math Lesson, check out the numbers

Math Lesson

This is too true to be funny.

The next time you hear a politician use the
Word ‘billion’ in a casual manner, think about whether you want the ‘politicians’ spending
YOUR tax money.

A billion is a difficult number to comprehend,
But one advertising agency did a good job of putting that figure into some perspective in one of its releases.
A.
A billion seconds ago it was 1959.
B.
A billion minutes ago Jesus was alive on this earth.

C.
A billion hours ago our ancestors were
living in the Stone Age.

D.
A billion days ago no-one walked on the earth on two feet.

E.
A billion dollars ago was only
8 hours and 20 minutes,
at the rate our government
is spending it.

While this thought is still fresh in our brain…
let’s take a look at New Orleans …
It’s amazing what you can learn with some simple division.

Louisiana Senator,
Mary Landrieu (D)
was asking Congress for
250 BILLION DOLLARS
To rebuild New Orleans. Interesting number…
What does it mean?

A.
Well .. If you are one of the 484,674 residents of New Orleans
(every man, woman and child),
you each get $516,528.

B.
Or… If you have one of the 188,251 homes in
New Orleans, your home gets $1,329,787.

C.
Or.. If you are a family of four…
Your family gets $2,066,012.

Washington, D.C.
Are all your calculators broken??

STILL THINK THIS IS FUNNY?

100 years ago… our nation was
the most prosperous in the world.

We had absolutely no national debt.
We had the largest middle class in the world.
And Mom stayed home to raise the kids.

What happened?
Can you spell

‘politicians!

And I still have to
press ‘1’
for English.

I hope this goes around the
U
S A
At
least 100 times.
What the heck has happened to our Country?

Also, a Trillion is 1,000 X a Billion. How many Trillions is the U.S. in debt?
How large is our national debt?
Who manages our debt and controls our currency? Not the Department of the Treasury.
A privately owned central bank that charges high interest on our debt to them for loaning us our own money. Something like 34 percent interest. Do you have a good idea why are national debt is growing exponentially?

What is happening in the U.S. and around the World has everything to do with money and the power it allows its owners. Please look up the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group, and the Counsel on Foreign Relations (CFR). They were all founded by David Rockefeller, the 21st descendant in a very rich and powerful family. One of the large, old families that have influenced World events to increase their wealth and control over the peoples of the World. Another such family are the Rothschilds. They are far more powerful than Rockefellers.

The Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group and the Counsel on Foreign Relations (CFR), (Obama is a member) are all known as think tanks. Probably so, but, what they are thinking is not in the best interests of freedom and liberty for all.

These organizations and others are behind what is happening to the United States and to other countries around the World. Please do the research before these organizations destroy everything and everyone you have/know.

Islam has a part in their dastardly planning. Islam will be used to grossly reduce the population on Earth by about two-thirds of what it is now. Obama is helping Islam to get ready to kill off all non-believers, starting with everyone in the white race, in the U.S. first and then around the World. Don’t think so? Check the numbers of illegal immigrants already here and that just started coming across our Southern border in droves, again. The numbers of refugees, 97 percent Muslim, that are being brought to the U.S. and dumped on communities like yours and mine. Folks, there are no good or moderate Muslims. They are all Islamic and they all obey their Imams. When Imams tell them to start killing off all non-believers and that they can rape and pillage until their hearts are content, they all will follow orders. If they don’t, they will be killed for being apostates.

You’ll see! Better study the enemy so you can better defend yourselves and your families. A famous general once said: “Know your enemy and he is yours.”

Joseph D. Hollinger
God Bless America!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

To Save America We Need Term Limits

My comments on a discussion from Constitution.com. Visit the article and post your opinion.

To Save America We Need Term Limits!

By Pamela Adams November 4, 2016

http://constitution.com/save-america-need-term-limits/

Many State Constitutions mirror most of what the Framers wrote. The Framers did provide term limits and they did not provide a word about having political parties. They did not give the Supreme Court the duty of interpreting what they so carefully framed into the foundation law set, ratified by the States, for our use in managing our government, comprised of people we give our consent to be governed by, for managing our country as the people express that it is to be managed.

Article I. Section 2. limits the amount of time each Member of the House of Representatives is to serve in these words: “Members shall be chosen every second year.” The word “Members” with an “s” is all inclusive. “shall be chosen every second year” means that every second year all new Members of the House of Representatives shall be chosen. Their use of the word “shall” is like etching their words in stone. Their are no options allowed and no other meaning than that given.

Article I. Section 3. limits the term for Senators to six years and establishes that each State shall have two Senators, chosen by the people thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote. Their term is limited to one, six years in length. “chosen by the People thereof for six years” no more.

Political parties are not mentioned by the Framers, thus, are not constitutional. Political organizations that conspire to shape our country according to the ideals held by members that develop into very powerful corporations having too much influence and financial power would never have been allowed by the Framers. They did mention having a two-party system.

A two-party system is one where two individuals that have differing ideas/opinions about a particular topic or topics work toghether to blend the characteristics upon which they agree and resolve, by negotiation, their differences on those on which they differ, or, discard them, in order to produce something that gives the People and the country the best of both views in a well thought out agreement.

There may be many that share the two opinions and there may not be. The most important thing the Framers demanded is that everyone work together and negotiate results that are good for the country and for the People. Taking sides sides based on one ideology or another and creating animosities between the sides that are devisive and separist by design, is not considered in the Framer’s plan for managing our country.

Politicians know that people like to take sides and they use that to play on their desire to be on the winning side in order to milk every dime out of them that can be squeezed from them so their guy/party will rein victorious. Politics is all about money and power. Money takes the first priority because those in possession of it also have power. You, perhaps, have heard the saying “Money talks and s–t walks.” If you haven’t got enough money to play with the big boys, get lost.

Money is the root of all evil!! Businesses have become far too big for their britches, so to speak. They have become too big and too powerful, to the point where their money, power and influence has become a threat to freedom and liberty the World over. Mom and Pop shops and other small and local businesses are what has made America great. Competition for the business of consumers has led to development of better products and services. “Build a better mouse trap and the World will beat a path to your door” is another old saying that applies.

I believe in Capitalism as long as it doesn’t run amok. We the People can control it with the power we have in our government. I believe in Constitutional Democracy, too, as long as it does not run amok.

We the People are the control mechanism that has the responsibilities for keeping Capitalism in check as well as keeping those in our government working within the specific confines of our Constitution, as it was crafted and has been legally amended (Article V., thereof).

Have your read: the Articles of the Confederation, the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Federalist Papers lately, or ever? I highly suggest that you do. I also suggest that you actively pursue your civic duty of managing your country by insuring that only the best and most qualified persons are elected to govern as you ( as one of many) tell them they are to manage it during their one term in office. We each have the power to hold them to one term as we vote. We each have the responsibility for participating in local government and local organizations where we can encourage people in their civic responsibilities.

Be aware, be sure, be prepared, be ready, be American!

Skip to content November 4, 2016

The Constitution

Menu

Columns

To Save America We Need Term Limits!

By Pamela Adams November 4, 2016

Regardless of who you’re supporting this election, there is one area on which we can all agree – too many politicians that have spent their lives as politicians. Because of these career congressmen, the whole system has become infested with corruption, including those behind the scenes. To fix the political machine, we must address more than just the congressional cogs. We have to expose all of the inner workings of the entire engine.

From day one, the machine begins and pressure is coming from all sides. Lawmakers going to office with pure, patriotic motives and goals often find themselves quickly chained to the evils of politics as usual. They are quickly faced with the option of working with the establishment and making some difference or sticking to principles and fighting an uphill battle.

When a junior congressman arrives in Washington, they are like the scared little pimple-faced freshmen entering the enormous high school for the very first time. They have no friends or connections. They have no idea where their classrooms are. They’re not even sure where to go to get a cup of coffee. Many turn to a senior congressman, often from their own state.

Seasoned Congressmen, whether in the House or Senate, happily extend a hand of friendship to their new colleagues. Openly building a bridge of trust, many secretly are weaving a web of exploitation.

Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) invited Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) into the Gang of 8 immigration bill upon his arrival to DC. A Tea Party favorite, Rubio naively thought McCain was being sincere. Rubio honestly believed they wanted his input. He was convinced his presence in the committee would ensure Tea Party concerns were addressed. It never occurred to Rubio that the establishment was just using him for their own purposes. As a result, participation in the establishment bill may have actually cost Rubio the Republican primary this year.

Ousting powerful career politicians, such as Eric Cantor or John Boehner, removes the symptoms, but the disease goes merrily on. Despite the fact that congressman change, the staff and aides remain in Washington. Most of these employees are career congressional staff workers. As politicians come and go, congressional personnel continue on. They are permanent “beltway insiders”. So when fresh-faced boy scout Mr. Smith goes to Washington, not only is Sen. Paine watching his every move, so are all the staff members.

These career congressional staff employees are the glue that holds Washington’s inner workings together. They, like the senior congressmen, are happy to show the freshmen the ropes and become trusted confidants to the new lawmakers.

Seasoned politicians will often lend a staff member to a new freshman knowing that employee can be influential to the unsuspecting recipient. It is also a way for the senior congressman to get an ear into the office of the new lawmaker to discover their plans and focus. So not only have Tea Party congressmen had to fight their party’s elite, they have often been sabotaged from inside the staff.

Congressmen propose, argue and vote on thousands of pages of legislation, but rarely do they read or even write them themselves. They rely on their staff to read, research, dissect and understand the proposed bills, especially since so much is written in legalese. The staff then summarizes the bill and often suggests to the congressman how they should vote on the legislation. If the staff is not completely on board with the Congressman’s politics, or has an agenda of their own, then bad advice can easily be given.

When working on a bill, the congressman primarily directs the content. In reality, staff members actually write the legislation. Which is how we end up with 1000 page bills of pork, unrelated requirements, hidden agendas and special favors.

Many issues regarding congressmen and staff can be remedied with one amendment – single subject bills. Each piece of legislation should focus on one subject only. Pork is eliminated. Secret regulations and special favors are annihilated. Furthermore, not only can congressmen review the document beforehand, the bill can easily be read to the whole chamber prior to the Congressional vote.

Staff members want to keep their jobs just as much as congressmen do. They want to be rehired when their current boss leaves town. Because of this, many fall in line with the establishment leadership to stay in the party’s good graces. A good recommendation from senior congressmen can go a long way for future positions. However, this practice impedes any steps of change the American voters are taking.

Restraining Congressional power by enforcing term limits would help relieve the stronghold they have on staff. But there is more that can be done. With today’s technology, a virtual Congress would also reduce the death grip Washington has on the American people. Congressmen would be forced to find local staff members as opposed to grabbing from the congressional pool in DC. The power of the beltway insiders would disintegrate while the power of the people would flourish.

Regardless of who becomes president, they will not solve the problems of Washington. Until “We the People” educate ourselves and decide to become the solution, the corruption that permeates our capital will continue to control the nation.

The future of America is our responsibility. We know the problems. We have the solutions. The question is, do we still have the will to save the country, or have we become complacent? I guess we’ll find out starting November 9th.

But that’s just my 2 cents.

Comment via Facebook
Comment via Disqus

TagsEric CantorJohn BoehnerJohn McCainMarco RubioTerm Limits Pamela Adams

Pamela Adams

Pamela J. Adams maintains TheFactsPaper.com which includes her blog Liberating Letters. She is a stay-at-home mom who began researching history, science, religion, and current events to prepare for home schooling. She started Liberating Letters as short lessons for her daughter and publishes them for everyone’s benefit. Pamela has a Degree in Mathematics and was in the workforce for 20 years as a teacher, Marketing Director, Manager and Administrative Assistant. She has been researching her personal family history for over 24 years, publishing 3 books on her family’s genealogy. Follow her @PJA1791 & http://www.TheFactsPaper.com. You can find her books Here.

Archives Website Twitter

Please leave your comments below

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments

Previous Article Trump Wins Vote of Young People AGAIN!
Next Article Could President Hillary Clinton Pardon Herself?

Trending on Constitution.com

Breaking! FBI Expects Multiple Indictments has Secret Recordings of Clinton Foundation!

Breaking! FBI Expects Multiple Indictments has Secret Recordings of Clinton Foundation!

Did the FBI just Declare WAR on the Clinton Campaign?

Did the FBI just Declare WAR on the Clinton Campaign?

The FBI’s ‘October Surprise’ May Have Been the Last Gasp Ending the Clinton Dynasty

The FBI’s ‘October Surprise’ May Have Been the Last Gasp Ending the Clinton Dynasty

Rapper Calls Black Lives Matter “Dumb A** Sh**”!

Rapper Calls Black Lives Matter “Dumb A** Sh**”!

Four New Earth Shattering Revelations in the FBI Investigation into the Clintons

Four New Earth Shattering Revelations in the FBI Investigation into the Clintons

CNN Has Worked Hard To Earn the Title of “Clinton News Network”

CNN Has Worked Hard To Earn the Title of “Clinton News Network”

Melania Trump Just Delivered a Game-Changing Speech in Pennsylvania!

Melania Trump Just Delivered a Game-Changing Speech in Pennsylvania!

Former FBI Official say “Something Big is about to Happen,” and Clintons are a “Crime Family”!

Former FBI Official say “Something Big is about to Happen,” and Clintons are a “Crime Family”!

13-Year Old Girl Destroys Hillary Clinton: “If Donald Trump Had A Brick For Every Lie Hillary Has Told He Could Build TWO Walls”!

13-Year Old Girl Destroys Hillary Clinton: “If Donald Trump Had A Brick For Every Lie Hillary Has Told He Could Build TWO Walls”!

America and Europe Soon to be Invaded

America and Europe Soon to be Invaded

New Anonymous Video Ties Huma Abedin to 9/11 Funders and Muslim Terrorists!

New Anonymous Video Ties Huma Abedin to 9/11 Funders and Muslim Terrorists!

Could President Hillary Clinton Pardon Herself?

Could President Hillary Clinton Pardon Herself?

Race for White House Collapsing for Democrats, But is it In Time for a Trump Win?

Race for White House Collapsing for Democrats, But is it In Time for a Trump Win?

Media to Trump Supporters: Stop Hurting Our Feelings!

Media to Trump Supporters: Stop Hurting Our Feelings!

Trump Women Problem? Maybe It Was Never Real

Trump Women Problem? Maybe It Was Never Real

Breaking! Assistant Attorney General Caught Helping Clinton Camp During Benghazi Hearings!

Breaking! Assistant Attorney General Caught Helping Clinton Camp During Benghazi Hearings!

“Abandon Ship” another Former Clinton Pollster Will NOT Vote for Hillary!

“Abandon Ship” another Former Clinton Pollster Will NOT Vote for Hillary!

001.jpg

Subscribe

Subscribe to Constitution.com Get a Free Copy of Catechism on the Constitution of the United States

Subscribe and get a free copy of Catechism on the Constitution of The United States

Submit

United States Constitution

Latest Columns

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

ADV: This is my shot:

There are more students graduating from high school now than ever because the schools
will not let anyone to repeat a grade. This makes numbers looks good but pumps more
ignorant people out on the World that have no idea what the World is or how it is supposed
to work.

Perfect candidates for the Trilateral Commission agenda being pushed by U.N. Agenda 2030
and the Muslim puppeteer in the White House, Valerie Jarrett, and her cohort who has been
training Hillary Clinton for 20 plus years, Huma Abedin.

I hope you know that if the Constitution is destroyed there will be no law in the United
States since we the people cannot be forced to comply with unconstitutional acts and we
will not do so.

The United States belongs to its citizens and no-one else. Government would not exist if
it were not for the people of the United States.

Anyone with a head on their shoulders know that politicians have bastardized the Constitution
through illegal acts accomplished because Americans trust the people they elect and have had
a blind eye to their becoming self-serving profiteers encouraged by the Trilateral Commission,
Bilderberg Group, the Atlantic, the Counsel on Foreign Relations, and several other nefarious
organizations established to rape the World for profits, theirs.

Enslavement of the peoples of the World is the goal, Agenda 2030 will enable the One World
Government which will follow the Trilateral Commission plan for creation a Socialist utopia
of profits for Big Businesses, Big Banks, and very big and powerful families such as Rockefeller
and Rothschild. Islam will be allowed to play a big part because it will spare no-one in its
attempts to destroy all non-believers, especially white ones. The fact that Islam does not
condone freedom or entertainment or privacy or anything but enslavement to its dictates fit
right into the plan for destroying two billions of lives that the World’s environment is unable
to support sustainably. (Bullshit, boss, bullshit) Ever heard of lemings?

No matter how many troops from how many countries that you amass in the United States
to put down dissent, you are not going to win. You are not going to pull fear tactics like we
see ISIS doing to scare us into compliance with your sick assed plans.

We the people of the United States of America will triumph in the end even if we have to stand
knee deep in blood to do so.

Just sayin’, you know. My opinions, of course. I am still free to have them and share them with
all that will read them.

Amen and Amen!

On 10/17/2016 9:33 AM, Trey Walk wrote:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

ADV: Ken Ivory

COS Team,

Why should United States citizens believe that the changes you are proposing, and marching
forward towards without the having the voices of the People being recorded as in favor?

Article V. requires that before any amendment to the Constitution can be accepted as a
Constitutional amendment and binding on all American citizens, any proposed amendment
must first be ratified by three-fourths of the States. During ratification by the States, absolutely
no changes can be made to the amendment proposed by any entity or the process has to
start over from the beginning.

Just who are the people that the states that comprise your COS team? Have they been chosen
by the people of each state supposedly represented thereby? What are their political views
other than wanting to amend the greatest constitution that has ever existed.

I personally am not going to sit by and watch a bunch of people appoint themselves a committee
for changing the foundation law set upon which our System of Laws is grounded. I want to know
for damn sure that those self appointed advocates for change have returning our government to
the people in accordance with the Constitution as it was written and has been legally amended
following Article V. thereof.

Jimmy Carter and every President since have been advocates for changes that are not constitutional
and were designed to either immediately denigrate the constitutional dictates or to do so at some
point in the future.

How do we know that you and your cohorts are not members of the Trilateral Commission, the
Atlantic, the Bilderberg Group, the Counsel on Foreign Relations, or some committee of the
United Nations attempting to further the U.N. Agenda 2030? Which is based on a theory that global
warming exists and is caused by humans. Agenda 2030 has 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)
the agenda says will solve the problems experienced by undeveloped countries that have leaders who do not
want their people to prosper and keep all aid that comes their way for their own personal profit?
I do not agree with redistribution of wealth of any sort. Those that are wealthy enjoy that freedom.
If they came about their wealth by underhanded means, they must be found out and penalized
following constitutional processes.

People from underdeveloped countries must learn to do what it takes to improve their lots in
life. Their welfare, except due to natural disasters or the sort, is their own business. Forcing people
to do what they should want to do on their own is interfering in their business and has gotten the
U.S.A. in trouble numerous times. Why should the result of United Nations interference produce
different results? It won’t and here is why.

The U.N. is comprised of leaders representatives (like John Kerry) from the World over. Many of them
represent miscreants that are dictators that steal from their people to live like kings while their
peoples live in abject poverty. These are not the kinds of leaders that care about ending extreme
poverty the World over. All they can see are more and bigger opportunities for becoming even more
wealthy and powerful in a grander scale. The end result of Agenda 2030 will be an established One
World Government “enforced” by miscreants for profit. I include Obama and his ilk in the group.

Islam is not without involvement in the plan for a One World Government. Obama is a huge
supporter who is controlled by his Muslim Chief Adviser, Valerie Jarrett. She has established
connections with radical Communists and with radical Islamic organization in the U.S. and
abroad. Funny isn’t it that neither Obama or Jarrett were vetted?

Suppose Hillary Clinton is successful in violating the Constitution by being elected President. She is
also controlled by a Muslim who has been grooming Hillary for being President for more than
20 years and whom also has ties to Islamic enemy factions in the U.S. and abroad that have
stated they want all non-believers, especially white people, dead.

Article II. Section 1. clearly states that only a man can be President and very definitely restricts
a president to one term of four years. The second sentence could not be more clear: “He shall hold
his Office for the Term of four Years, ….” “He shall hold his” means male only. If either sex was
considered the sentence would start with: “A President shall hold his office”. This is a prime example
of how the Constitution has been discreetly changed by dishonest politicians who play on the
structured ignorance and lack of participation in government that has been bred into Americans
by our educational system and our society.

Here is another. The 22nd Amendment gives a President two four-year terms so that it can restrict
him to that number when, in actuality, what it does is unconstitutional and illegal. The 22nd
Amendment does not amend Article II. Section 1. or mention it. Thus, Article II. Section 1. remains
as written and is still binding on all presidents.

Everyone that has anything to do with managing our government has but one goal and that is
to fatten their pockets and allow them to dominate the folks who produce the wealth that has
made their pockets fatter. How can I be sure you and your group are honest and above board
(Ha, not very likely) and your being honest in your attempts to add constraints on those in
government service, elected and/or appointed?

Read the Constitution word for word and understand it as it is written. No hidden meanings
or double entendres to hide the real intentions of the authors as is the rule today. No taking
advantage of the want of Americans to believe and believe in those they elect to exact harm
on them in the future by weakening the foundation law set that is supposed to guarantee
freedom and liberty for all in perpetuity.

The Framers created the Constitution under the assumption that honest men would administer
its dictates and follow them faithfully. It would have been impossible to frame such a law set
that would encompass protection from every weakness of man or from man’s desire to have
more of things than others. They left the task of insuring that the Constitution is followed to
the letter up to American citizens who are the beneficiaries of their great work and the freemen
it has created.

Changing the Constitution will do no good when our entire government does not honor it
except when it is convenient for them and/or enables them to move their agenda for
change forward for their profit.

We have a Supreme Court that is corrupted to the core. The only voice of reason and
Constitution expert was assassinated to get him out of the way. Justice Alito did not die
an accidental death. He was found with a pillow over his face.

The rest of the Justices are not honoring the positions they hold nor are they separated
from the politics of the President that appointed them as the Framers intended. Justices
must have no personal opinions and must owe no allegiances to anyone for anything.
Their is to uphold the Constitution as it was written and has been legally amended, nothing
more, nothing less.

They must preserve, protect and defend the Constitution, our foundation law set upon
which all other laws are based, from all enemies, both foreign and domestic. What are
domestic enemies? Politicians of every flavor that plot, plan, deceive, act in any manner
that attempts to/weakens or distorts the Framer’s words in any manner from the way they
were written.

How do I know that you and those who support your efforts towards a COS are not
domestic enemies? Can you prove you are not? Will each of you pass a newspaper test
of exposing all their is to know about you and the people with whom you associate? I
bet not but hope so.

I recommend that you and your supporters work towards awakening the American people to
their constitutional duties and civic responsibilities and bringing back communities in America.
Let’s get rid of racial biases and strive to have every citizen be known as an American
with no descriptive adjectives to divide us into one group or another. Then we will have a
strong America once again. Our country will again be the envy of all others, not the
laughing stock of most others it is now.

Sincerely concerned your efforts are being made for the wrong purpose at the wrong time,

Joseph D. Hollinger
God Bless America!
Do Not Reelect Anyone now serving!

On 10/14/2016 1:18 AM, The Convention of States Team wrote:

Ken Ivory: “Today’s the day. The winds of change are about to blow.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

McCaskill says: What Hillary has done For women Outweighs Nasty Name_Calling. Really?

My comments concerning:

Sen. McCaskill: What Hillary Has done For women Outweighs Nasty Name-Calling. Really?

Posted at: http://libertyalliance.com/sen-mccaskill-hillary-done-women-outweighs-nasty-name-calling-really/

Consider the source of claims that Hillary has done enough for women to erase the negatives surrounding her. Clair McCaskill is a died in the wool radical Liberal that does no honor the desires of her constituents if they are not exactly as she wants. McCaskill has no business being in the Senate or anywhere else in public service. She does not work for the people that elected her time and time again in violation of the Constitutional limit of one term for everyone in the Senate, the House, and the Presidency.

Worse yet, she is supporting a woman, Hillary, for President in violation of Article II. Section 1.that clearly states that only a man shall be President. In the second sentence, which defines whom a President is to be but also how long a president shall serve.

“He shall hold his Office for the Term of four Years, ….” “He shall hold his” could not be more clear and there is no valid way to explain those words (the word “shall” makes those words untouchable) to mean something else. “for the Term of four Years, ….” The word “shall” also applies to this part of the sentence. Diagram the sentence an you will see why it does.

A president shall be male and he shall hold his office “for the Term of four Years,….”. The word “the” with the word “Term”, “the Term” means “the one term” four Years in length.

Nothing in the Constitution provides for anyone to serve more than one Term. There is a reason for this and we are experiencing what happens when the Constitution is not followed to the letter as it has to be for our country to retain its greatness for the benefit of all peoples.

The Framers knew well the weaknesses of men when exposed, over time, to unguarded temptations for which there are no penalties for abuse. They also knew that when people having the public trust fell to those temptations they would come to serve the fruits of those temptations before all else, including their oaths-of-office and their duty to serve constituents concerns before their own. The Constitution makes no provisions that make members of the House, the Senate and/or the Presidency omnipotent. Nor does it permit them to ignore the voices of the people that they represent once they take office and, instead, vote their own voice and concerns. Elected persons are to think about how to follow the law while addressing constituents concerns and nothing more. They are public servants, first, last and always.

We can see that our system of managing government following the strict guidelines for doing so in the Constitution has been corrupted to a point that government is but a shadow of what it should be. We, American citizens, must make very careful and well studied moves to reclaim our country by returning it to the Constitution, as written and legally amended following Article V. thereof.

http://libertyalliance.com/sen-mccaskill-hillary-done-women-outweighs-nasty-name-calling-really/http://libertyalliance.com/sen-mccaskill-hillary-done-women-outweighs-nasty-name-calling-really/

Trending

Liberty Alliance

Navigate

You are at:Home»Websites»LibertyUnyielding.com»Sen. McCaskill: What Hillary Has done For women Outweighs Nasty Name-Calling. Really?

Sen. McCaskill: What Hillary Has done For women Outweighs Nasty Name-Calling. Really?

0
By Liberty Alliance on October 3, 2016 LibertyUnyielding.com, Videos

monica

So Hillary Clinton called Monica Lewinsky a “narcissistic loony toon.” So what? And so what if she called Gennifer Flowers “a gold digger” and “the daughter of Willie Horton” — whatever that last dig was supposed to mean. And, yes, Clinton has been calling Kathleen Willey, another of her hubby’s “conquests,” a “bimbo” for the last 19 years. But what of it?

The important thing, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D., Mo.) told Chris Wallace on “Fox News Sunday,” is all the good Clinton has done for women, which outweighs those ugly labels she applied to the many gals who claimed they were raped, groped, or simply had sex with Bill Clinton.

Here’s the video. A transcript of the money portion follows:

You know, Hillary Clinton may have defended her husband in various situations,but if we want to compare what she has done for women in her life, how she has worked – I mean, when the cameras weren’t rolling, when no one was looking, after a law degree from one of the best schools in the country, she went to work for the Children’s Defense Fund.

Since McCaskill raised the subject of Mrs. Clinton’s work as an attorney helping children, maybe she could comment on Hillary’s defense in 1075 of a man accused of sexually assaulting a 12-year-old girl who Clinton savaged in court.

More importantly, if Clinton is going to be excused for her calling women disgusting things because she supposedly did some good for them, why shouldn’t the same pass be given to Donald Trump? According to The Washington Post:

Continue Reading

Previous ArticleIn 2016 Election, Plain Old Conspiracy Theories Are No Match For New York Times’s Criminality
Next Article Baiting Trump
Posting Policy
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

Trending on Liberty Alliance

Liberty Alliance

Join The Alliance!

Enter your email address below to stay in the loop and join The Liberty Alliance.

>>

© 2016 Liberty Alliance. All Rights Reserved. Proudly built by WPDevelopers

STAY IN THE LOOP
Don’t miss a thing. Sign up for our email newsletter to become a Liberty Alliance insider.
Subscribe

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

ADV: New Report on Access to Counsel in Immigration Courts

Dear Beth,

Illegal immigrants and refugees forced to come here in order to get relief from supposed duress
in their country of origin, are not entitled to receive relief other than temporary sustenance and
shelter from the weather, no more.

The Constitution does not say that American citizens are required to support and sustain immigrants/
refugees for any reason, especially when doing so puts support systems designed and implemented
to provide for Americans that may need those services as a hand up, not a handout. Handouts are
what these people are looking for and they are unwilling, for the most part, to follow any of the rules
and requirements that immigrants have to agree to in order to remain in the United States. Especially,
the requirement for everyone of them to assimilate into, and become as one with, and indistinguishable
from all Americans.

Every person in the United States from another country from which free travel into the U.S. is not permitted
must be made to comply with these rules, without exception for any reason, or return to their country of
origin – period.

Islam is not a recognized religion in the United States because it is the antithesis of every form of religion
practiced in the United States when the Constitution was framed and ratified as the foundation law set upon
which government by the people depends and upon which our System of Laws is dependent for
validity.

No amendment to the Constitution has been ratified in accordance with Article V. thereof, that recognizes
religion in forms other than Christianity or Judaism. The Framers lived in societies wherein Christianity was
the primary form of religion (the Church of England) that controlled most everything. Kinda sorta like
Islam. Islam is an ideology of control with failure to comply punishable by death and/or dismemberment.

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the exercise thereof; ….”

I found the following explanation of “an establishment of religion” on the Federalist Papers website.
http://thefederalistpapers.org/current-events/what-freedom-of-religion#comment-5393733

“When the founders first prohibited an establishment of religion, there was little need for them to explain what
was meant by that phrase. Most of the citizens of the new nation had lived under governments with established
churches and had an instinctive knowledge of what exactly was being prohibited by the First Amendment. Now,
more than two centuries later, most Americans read this phrase with little if any comprehension of its true meaning.
To them, the Amendment’s prohibition against an established religion is a nebulous preference for a secular form of
government, but this is not what the founders had in mind.”

“To properly understand what was prohibited by the First Amendment, it is necessary for us to discover how the
founders would have understood the phrase “an establishment of religion.” To do this, let us consider the
explanation proffered by one of the men who argued strongly in favor of having an established church in America,
Thomas Bradbury Chandler. Bishop Chandler wrote that:

“An established religion, is a religion which the civil authority engages, not only to protect, but to support; and a
religion that is not provided for by the civil authority, but which is left to provide for itself, or to subsist on the
provision it has already made, can be no more than a tolerated religion.””

“Here Bishop Chandler makes a very important distinction between religious establishment and religious toleration.
According to his definition the sole distinction between the two is that of monetary support from the government
for a specific religion. This distinction was addressed by James Madison in a letter to Rev. Jasper Adams in 1832.
Madison wrote:

““The simple question to be decided is whether a support of the best and purest religion, the Christian religion
itself ought not so far at least as pecuniary means are involved, to be provided for by the Government rather
than be left to the voluntary provisions of those who profess it.””

“Madison went on to conclude that:

the existing character, distinguished as it is by its religious features, and the lapse of time now more than 50
years since the legal support of Religion was withdrawn sufficiently prove that it does not need the support of
Government, and it will scarcely be contended that Government has suffered by the exemption of Religion from
its cognizance, or its pecuniary aid.”

“Madison’s focus on the pecuniary provision for religion by the government supports Bishop Chandler’s definition
of an established religion as one which receives monetary support from the state, but Madison also mentioned
the exemption of religion from the cognizance of the government, and this seems more in line with the modern
preference for a secular state. To properly understand this statement, however, we must turn to an early 18th
century author named William Warburton. Madison actually recommended to Thomas Jefferson that some of
Bishop Warburton’s books be added to the library of the University of Virginia. One of the Bishop’s books which
was not recommended was a defense of established religion entitled The Alliance Between Church and State. In
that book Bishop Warburton identified six essential characteristics of an establishment of religion.”

“The first three of these six characteristics have to do with the powers wielded by an established church within the
state, and the remaining three describe the powers which the state holds over the church thus established. In the
first category of powers wielded by an established church, Bishop Warburton placed the ability of that church to be
fully funded from the treasury of the state, the right to claim direct representation of the church within the
legislature and the power to establish an ecclesiastical court to try citizens of the state for heresies against the
church. In the second category of powers wielded by the state over the established church, the Bishop identified
the authority of the state to determine who would be eligible to serve in the church, the authority to preside over
church councils and the authority to have the final say in all cases of excommunication. These six characteristics, in
some form or another, can be identified in every recorded alliance between an established church and the state, and
without them there cannot be an establishment of religion.”

“This brings us back to the consideration of the actual wording of the First Amendment. If the founders understood
with Bishop Chandler that the choice was between establishment and toleration, then it follows that the prohibition
against an establishment must be viewed as a preference for toleration to some degree or another. And if they
recognized with Bishop Warburton the six common characteristics of an established church, then it follows that
the bounds of toleration would be limited only from a legal recognition of interactions which fall within those six
areas. In essence, this understanding of the First Amendment would mean that the church and the state are
permitted by the Constitution to enjoy a much greater degree of mutual interaction than is currently recognized.
This explains the tremendous amount of such interactions which occurred during the terms of the first four
Presidents, and it should be our goal to return to an understanding of the First Amendment which does not
criminalize the actions of our own founders.””

Wishing you a great day.

Joseph D. Hollinger
God Bless America

On 9/28/2016 4:23 PM, Beth Werlin wrote:

Dear Joseph D.,

Today, the American Immigration Council released Access to Counsel in Immigration Court, a report based on the first national study on access to counsel in immigration courts. The report analyzes 1.2 million individual removal cases in immigration court between fiscal years 2007 and 2012 and concludes that access to legal counsel is scarce and uneven across geographic locations and nationalities. It also finds that immigrants who are represented by an attorney are more likely to be released from detention, apply for relief, and obtain the relief they seek.

In fact, without an attorney, only two percent of those who applied for relief from deportation succeeded. These alarming findings need to guide us toward creating an immigration system that is true to our country’s commitment to justice and due process. We are thrilled to have partnered with the report’s authors, Ingrid Eagly, Esq. and Steven Shafer, Esq., to bring attention to the inequities in access to counsel and the crucial role that counsel can play in the immigration process.

We hope you too will join us in exposing the facts about our current system and in promoting a fair system that reflects our country’s values. We also invite you to support the Council today.

Beth Werlin
Executive Director

P.S. Help us spread the word about these findings on Facebook and Twitter. You can also read our blog on the report here.

American Immigration Council
1331 G St. NW Suite 200
Washington, D.C., 20005

UNSUBSCRIBE

empowered by Salsa
TrackImage?key=472818646=’472818646′>

The Federalist Papers

The People Who Mean To Be Their Governors Must Arm Themselves With The Power Which Knowledge Gives

A People Who Mean To Be Their Governors Must Arm Themselves With The Power Which Knowledge Gives

Google+RSSTwitterFacebook

You are here: Home / Current Events / What Freedom of Religion?

What Freedom of Religion?

September 22, 2013 By Bill Fortenberry 29 Comments

What Freedom of Religion by Bill FortenberryMuch of the debate on the relationship between church and state has centered around the phrases “freedom of religion” and “separation of church and state.” While these phrases have a very important history and should be studied, their applicability to American government must be understood within the confines of the First Amendment. Unfortunately, the debate on this Amendment has largely focused on whether or not its prohibitions are limited to the US Congress. The real key to understanding the First Amendment lies in unlocking the mystery of the phrase “an establishment of religion.”

When the founders first prohibited an establishment of religion, there was little need for them to explain what was meant by that phrase. Most of the citizens of the new nation had lived under governments with established churches and had an instinctive knowledge of what exactly was being prohibited by the First Amendment. Now, more than two centuries later, most Americans read this phrase with little if any comprehension of its true meaning. To them, the Amendment’s prohibition against an established religion is a nebulous preference for a secular form of government, but this is not what the founders had in mind.

To properly understand what was prohibited by the First Amendment, it is necessary for us to discover how the founders would have understood the phrase “an establishment of religion.” To do this, let us consider the explanation proffered by one of the men who argued strongly in favor of having an established church in America, Thomas Bradbury Chandler. Bishop Chandler wrote that:

“An established religion, is a religion which the civil authority engages, not only to protect, but to support; and a religion that is not provided for by the civil authority, but which is left to provide for itself, or to subsist on the provision it has already made, can be no more than a tolerated religion.”

Here Bishop Chandler makes a very important distinction between religious establishment and religious toleration. According to his definition the sole distinction between the two is that of monetary support from the government for a specific religion. This distinction was addressed by James Madison in a letter to Rev. Jasper Adams in 1832. Madison wrote:

“The simple question to be decided is whether a support of the best and purest religion, the Christian religion itself ought not so far at least as pecuniary means are involved, to be provided for by the Government rather than be left to the voluntary provisions of those who profess it.”

Madison went on to conclude that:

“the existing character, distinguished as it is by its religious features, and the lapse of time now more than 50 years since the legal support of Religion was withdrawn sufficiently prove that it does not need the support of Government, and it will scarcely be contended that Government has suffered by the exemption of Religion from its cognizance, or its pecuniary aid.”

Madison’s focus on the pecuniary provision for religion by the government supports Bishop Chandler’s definition of an established religion as one which receives monetary support from the state, but Madison also mentioned the exemption of religion from the cognizance of the government, and this seems more in line with the modern preference for a secular state. To properly understand this statement, however, we must turn to an early 18th century author named William Warburton. Madison actually recommended to Thomas Jefferson that some of Bishop Warburton’s books be added to the library of the University of Virginia. One of the Bishop’s books which was not recommended was a defense of established religion entitled The Alliance Between Church and State. In that book Bishop Warburton identified six essential characteristics of an establishment of religion.

The first three of these six characteristics have to do with the powers wielded by an established church within the state, and the remaining three describe the powers which the state holds over the church thus established. In the first category of powers wielded by an established church, Bishop Warburton placed the ability of that church to be fully funded from the treasury of the state, the right to claim direct representation of the church within the legislature and the power to establish an ecclesiastical court to try citizens of the state for heresies against the church. In the second category of powers wielded by the state over the established church, the Bishop identified the authority of the state to determine who would be eligible to serve in the church, the authority to preside over church councils and the authority to have the final say in all cases of excommunication. These six characteristics, in some form or another, can be identified in every recorded alliance between an established church and the state, and without them there cannot be an establishment of religion.

Your Family Must Master This 1 Simple Trick in Order To Survive Any Crisis or Disaster – Click Here To Watch

This brings us back to the consideration of the actual wording of the First Amendment. If the founders understood with Bishop Chandler that the choice was between establishment and toleration, then it follows that the prohibition against an establishment must be viewed as a preference for toleration to some degree or another. And if they recognized with Bishop Warburton the six common characteristics of an established church, then it follows that the bounds of toleration would be limited only from a legal recognition of interactions which fall within those six areas. In essence, this understanding of the First Amendment would mean that the church and the state are permitted by the Constitution to enjoy a much greater degree of mutual interaction than is currently recognized. This explains the tremendous amount of such interactions which occurred during the terms of the first four Presidents, and it should be our goal to return to an understanding of the First Amendment which does not criminalize the actions of our own founders.

Bill Fortenberry

About Bill Fortenberry

Bill Fortenberry is a native of Birmingham, AL where he currently resides with his wife and young son. He has been debating and writing in defense of the Christian faith for more than 20 years, and his articles have been featured in publications around the globe. He is the author of Hidden Facts of the Founding Era, a book which answers some of the most difficult challenges to the claim that America was founded as a Christian nation.

Bill is also the founder of the PersonhoodInitiative.com website where his research on ectopic pregnancies has changed the nature of the pro-life debate, and he shares articles on a variety of topics on his personal website IncreasingLearning.com.

Web | Facebook | More Posts (12)

Filed Under: Current Events Tagged With: first amendment, freedom of religion, separation between church and State

Comments

Trackbacks

  1. keachfan | Frenetic Friday says:
    January 23, 2015 at 6:51 pm
    […] In fact an excellent examination of what the establishment clause means can be found here. The Founders saw religion being more than just “pew, heart, and home” but rather […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment

Name *

Email *

Website

NO WAY! Look What Happened During Tim Tebow’s First at Bat in Pro Baseball

NO WAY! Look What Happened During Tim Tebow's First at Bat in Pro Baseball

Senate Overrides Obama; Here’s How The Obama WH Responded

Senate Overrides Obama; Here's How The Obama WH Responded

Trey Gowdy DESTROYS FBI Director Comey Over Hillary Email Case

Trey Gowdy DESTROYS FBI Director Comey Over Hillary Email Case

BREAKING: Democrats HACKED Again

BREAKING: Democrats HACKED Again

Look at the Ratio of Billionaire Donors For Clinton vs Trump…

Look at the Ratio of Billionaire Donors For Clinton vs Trump...

BREAKING: Senate OVERRIDES Obama Veto

BREAKING: Senate OVERRIDES Obama Veto

FBI Email Dump Reveals Role of ‘Confidential’ Clinton Aide

FBI Email Dump Reveals Role of 'Confidential' Clinton Aide

EXPOSED: Huma Abedin’s Radical Islamic Roots

EXPOSED: Huma Abedin's Radical Islamic Roots

BREAKING: Huge Change in Poll Data After First Debate

BREAKING: Huge Change in Poll Data After First Debate

Meme Brutally Exposes Evolution of Protests in the USA Over the Years

Meme Brutally Exposes Evolution of Protests in the USA Over the Years

EXPOSED: Huma Abedin’s Radical Islamic Roots

EXPOSED: Huma Abedin's Radical Islamic Roots

BREAKING: Huge Change in Poll Data After First Debate

BREAKING: Huge Change in Poll Data After First Debate

Meme Brutally Exposes Evolution of Protests in the USA Over the Years

Meme Brutally Exposes Evolution of Protests in the USA Over the Years

Look at The New FBI Stat That DESTROYS Liberal Gun Grabbers’ Agenda

Look at The New FBI Stat That DESTROYS Liberal Gun Grabbers’ Agenda

Delicate Students Call “Hate Response Teams” To Report Christian Cross On Poster

Delicate Students Call

Recent Posts

tebow

NO WAY! Look What Happened During Tim Tebow’s First at Bat in Pro Baseball

September 28, 2016 By C.E. Dyer Leave a Comment

senateobama

Senate Overrides Obama; Here’s How The Obama WH Responded

September 28, 2016 By C.E. Dyer Leave a Comment

gowdycomey

Trey Gowdy DESTROYS FBI Director Comey Over Hillary Email Case

September 28, 2016 By C.E. Dyer 2 Comments

donkeycellphone

BREAKING: Democrats HACKED Again

September 28, 2016 By C.E. Dyer Leave a Comment

sorosclinton

Look at the Ratio of Billionaire Donors For Clinton vs Trump…

September 28, 2016 By C.E. Dyer Leave a Comment

Recent Comments

Testimonial

The Federalist Papers, the education you bring to your readers is immeasurable. Now more than ever, Americans need to learn about their country’s founding and its founders. Keep up the good work. – Buddy Novotney

Testimonial

The Federalist Papers admins do a wonderful job of going through our founding documents (and sometimes others) to find pertinent, timely and always thought-provoking pieces. I have discovered a new admiration for Patrick Henry from their work! Thank you, admins! – Lisa Hoppman

© Copyright 2016 The Federalist Papers · All Rights Reserved
Design by MIDesign & Marketing Consultants

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

All Of A Sudden….., and, here are the real enemies we face today.

Islam is definitely the enemy of freedom and liberty. Muslims are born into Islam and have it drummed into their heads
from that point forward. Fear keeps them faithful to the dictates of Islam, the ideology of slavery where everyone but Islamic
leaders are at or near the poverty line and kept that way so they will be easier to control.

I am not defending Islam or those that follow it one little bit, but, we have other more terrible forces at work with the same goals
as Islam; making everyone destitute slaves to the state so they must do what government says or starve, be killed, have their children
taken away, have their home burned, etc.

The Trilateral Commission has infiltrated our government and holds high offices from which policies can be set that further their
goals for a strict Socialist state where working class people are slaves and destitute, totally dependent on government for their
lives and the right to remain alive.

David Rockefeller, the 101st Rockefeller to lead the family dynasty, has founded at least four organizations who share common goals
for a New World Order, headquartered in the United Nations building, but controlled by the super rich and powerful families such as
the Rockefeller and Rothschild families and super rich and powerful individuals the World over.

Here are some links you need to follow to learn about the Trilateral Commission (Bill Clinton is a member as are many others that are
or were in our government service and military). There is a list of members that is 18 pages long and reads like “Who’s Who” of
powerful people in the U.S. and around the World.

Trilateral Commission

https://publicintelligence.net/trilateral-commission-complete-membership-list-may-2010/

After you have studied up on the Trilateral Commission and gasped at who its members are and what its agenda (they don’t hide anything),
you need to read the article about what the President of Brazil was impeached, what the new leader’s agenda is and the fact that he
took office even though the Brazilian courts forbade his becoming President of Brazil and no-one raised a hand to stop him. You will also
learn what his neo-Liberal agenda involves. It fits right into the plan espoused by the Trilateral Commission. It also fits right into what
is happening in the U.S. right now and no-one is lifting a finger to interfere. Powerful people in high places carry big hammers with which
to smash small pests that try to get in their way. You don’t see any of it in the news because the heads of all main stream media outlets
are members of the Trilateral Commission. Now you will understand why the media is not reporting the truth and is, instead, telling us
what the Trilateral Commission wants us to hear and in the way they want us to hear it, if at all.

“Brazilian President Michel Temer: Dilma Rousseff Impeached Because
She Didn’t Support Neoliberalism”

Michel Temer is the imposter President of Brazil, he placed himself in power after President Dilma Rousseff was deposed for impeachment.
Brazilian courts ruled that he was not to take over as President but he did so anyway.

Rousseff rejected a proposal by Temer’s party which included ‘cuts to health and education spending, reduced welfare benefits, a raised
retirement age, new private sector partnerships and decreased market regulations,’ according to a journalist at The Intercept Brasil.
By Kit O’Connell @KitOConnell | September 26, 2016

We are seeing, and will see moves to: cut health and education spending, reduce welfare benefits, a raise
retirement age, allow new private sector partnerships and decrease market regulations. All are for the benefits of big businesses and big
banks, the foundation of the Trilateral Commission.

http://www.mintpressnews.com/220783-2/220783/

Bilderberg 2016: The Agenda and Full Attendees List

http://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/bilderberg-2016/

List of Bilderberg participants

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following is a list of prominent persons who are known to have attended one or more conferences organized by the Bilderberg Group. The list is currently organized by category. It is not a complete list and it includes both living and deceased people. Where known, the year(s) they attended are denoted in brackets.

This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bilderberg_participants

The Order of the Illuminati: Its Origins, Its Methods and Its Influence
on the World Events (Freemasonry was consumed by the Illuminati)

http://vigilantcitizen.com/hidden-knowledge/the-order-of-the-illuminati/

The Council on Foreign Relations

“The CFR is a serpentine network of international revolutionaries and fascist ideologues whose goal is to end American
sovereignty and bring about a global, Marxist paradise. House, a socialist, wrote in his book, Philip Dru: Administrator,
that he was working for “Socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx.” He told of a “conspiracy” which would gain control of
both political parties, and use them as instruments in the creation of a socialist world government. (John McManus,
The Insiders, pg. 7.)”

Bill Clinton: former president of the United States, also a member of David Rockefeller’s Bilderberger group and was in
1992 the only State Governor listed in the membership role of the Trilateral Commission.

http://www.jeremiahproject.com/newworldorder/nworder06.html

Americas Society / Council of the Americas

Another group founded by David Rockefeller. Although not mentioned, after your read up on the following
site, go back and read the article about the impeachment of the President of Brazil and see if you can see
a probable connection.

In case Trump & Clinton don’t get to US foreign policy in Latin America at #Debates2016, here’s where they
stand: http://bit.ly/2cJ9URR

https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/americas-society-council-of-the-americas#/entity

There are more secret societies at work in America. Don’t discount their power and influence on U.S. and
World politics, business, banking, and governments. Not all conspiracy theories are far off of the truth and
it never hurts to be curious and well advised.

You will find links to other organizations as you peruse the information at the sources I have found and
provided for your information and enlightenment. Please be curious and learn about them and their agenda.
If you follow what is going on today in the visible world and behind the scenes you are going to be able to
patch the bits and pieces together and come up with a view of the real world that is far worse than we are
lead to believe.

Are your ready to take part and be an integral part of exposing what is really happening. Exposure is the
fastest and surest way to put an end to these kinds of groups and their agenda. Let’s work together to study,
research and publish all that we can find and verify. If we don’t, billions of people will probably be eliminated
because these groups want them gone so the atmosphere will be safer for them for longer.

God Bless America!
Joseph D. Hollinger

On 9/26/2016 5:51 PM, palarose wrote:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Hillary’s still being in the running explained

Thought you might be interested in seeing this. Kinda

scary if you ask me, but interesting at the same time.

THIS MIGHT SOLVE THE PUZZLE…..

ABC News executive producer Ian Cameron is

married to Susan Rice, National Security Adviser.

CBS President David Rhodes is the brother of

Ben Rhodes, Obama’s Deputy National Security

Adviser for Strategic Communications.

ABC News correspondent Claire Shipman is married

to former Whitehouse Press Secretary Jay Carney

ABC News and Univision reporter Matthew Jaffe is

married to Katie Hogan, Obama’s Deputy Press Secretary

ABC President Ben Sherwood is the brother of

Obama’s Special Adviser Elizabeth Sherwood

CNN President Virginia Moseley is married to

former Hillary Clinton’s Deputy Secretary Tom Nides.

And now you know why it is no surprise the media

is in Obama’s pocket.

Think there might be a little bias in the news?

This may also explain the cover up of Hillary’s private

server and emails, Benghazi, Obamacare’s soaring costs,

$20 trillion U.S. debt. etc., etc., etc., etc., etc.,, etc.,……..

Isn’t it interesting that every place you look in Obama’s administration

people fill positions because of who they know, not what they know or

how competent they are ——

and you wonder why our country has so many problems.

Now you know.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

“STUPID Is As STUPID DOES”

I received the following in an email today. I have sent many emails and made many posts warning about
Obama being a Muslim totally dedicated to advancing Islam throughout the World. Everything he does is
geared to do just that. You are going to see a whole lot of shocking stuff take place in the period between
the elections and the date in January when those elected are sworn in. You are not going to like any of it.

Don’t be surprised if some event somewhere in the World does not get escalated into a major threat to the
continental United States and her citizens (us), even though the majority of people the World over do not
see it to be so. Obama will do the escalating until he can exercise National Presidential Security Directive 51
(NSPD 51 and its sister Homeland Security Presidential Directive 20 (HSPD 20)). The following is the stated
purpose of the directive(s):

“Purpose

(1) This directive establishes a comprehensive national policy on the continuity of Federal Government structures and operations and a
single National Continuity Coordinator responsible for coordinating the development and implementation of Federal continuity policies. This
policy establishes “National Essential Functions,” prescribes continuity requirements for all executive departments and agencies, and
provides guidance for State, local, territorial, and tribal governments, and private sector organizations in order to ensure a comprehensive
and integrated national continuity program that will enhance the credibility of our national security posture and enable a more rapid and
effective response to and recovery from a national emergency.”

Go here to read more. HERE
You are not going to like what your read, especially that the Addendum is top secret and members of Congress don’t know what is in it.
Unless they have recently been given access..

You will notice in the statement of “Purpose” that “a single National Continuity Coordinator responsible for coordinating the development
and implementation of Federal continuity policies.” That will be Obama and he will be the unilateral leader of the United States. Under
this directive he can disband the Supreme Court and send Congress home for the duration of the emergency. Please note that Obama
will determine when a National Emergency exists and only he will determine when it is over. If it is ever over.

Should Obama exercise NSPD 51 after the elections, those newly elected will never take office, there will be no swearing in. We will have
become citizens of a dictatorship. Obama has built a private Army in the United States and has active plans for using troops from other
countries to suppress unrest and to arrest domestic terrorists. You have heard about government agencies that have never had a need
for firearms and riot gear using government funds to purchase them and created defensive forces in such unlikely places as Post Offices,
EPA, VA, and many others. What are these troops for? Isn’t that spending tax dollars misappropriated from the uses for which they
were intended? That is illegal. Who made the decision to do this? Did Congress fund them using legislation? I don’t think so. Ever
heard of FEMA Camps? Better do some research. If you have openly spoken out against Obama and his policies you could end up in
one of them never to be heard of again.

None of the treats of yesterday have gone away. They have been growing in the background to become worse threats than before.

Joseph D. Hollinger
God Bless America, My Country tis of Thee!

OK, THIS MAY BE RACIAL, OR EVEN PROFILING. BUT WE NEED TO PROTECT OUR- SELVES AND OUR COUNTRY. IT SEEMS TO ME THAT RACIAL/PROFILING MAY BE THE ONLY WAY TO DO THAT. WE HAVE TO DO SOMETHING, OR WE WILL CERTAINLY LOSE OUR COUNTRY.

Do you remember?

47 years since 1968 and this just keeps going on and on.

1. In 1968, Bobby Kennedy was shot and killed by a Muslim male.

2. In 1972, at the Munich Olympics, Israeli athletes were kidnapped and massacred by Muslim males.

3. In 1972, a Pan Am 747 was hijacked and eventually diverted to Cairo where a fuse was lit on final approach. Shortly after landing it was blown up by Muslim males.

4. In 1973, a Pan Am 707 was destroyed in Rome, with 33 people killed, when it was attacked with grenades by Muslim males.

5. In 1979, the US embassy in Iran was taken over by Muslim males.

6. During the 1980’s a number of Americans were kidnapped in Lebanon by Muslim males.

7. In 1983, the US Marine barracks in Beirut was blown up by Muslim males.

8. In 1985, the cruise ship Achilles Lauro was hijacked and a 70-year old American passenger was murdered and thrown overboard in his wheelchair by Muslim males.

9. In 1985, TWA flight 847 was hijacked at Athens, and a US Navy diver trying to rescue passengers was murdered by Muslim males.

10. In 1988, Pan Am Flight 103 was bombed by Muslim males.

11. In 1993, the World Trade Center was bombed the first time by Muslim males.

12. In 1998, the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed by Muslim males.

13. On 9/11/01, four airliners were hijacked; two were used as missiles to take down the World Trade Centers and of the remaining two, one crashed into the US Pentagon and the other was diverted and crashed by the passengers. Thousands of people were killed by Muslim males.

14. In 2002, the United States fought a war in Afghanistan against Muslim males.

15. In 2002, reporter Daniel Pearl was kidnapped and beheaded by – you guessed it – a Muslim male. (Plus two other American journalists who were just recently beheaded).

16. In 2013, the Boston Marathon Bombing resulted in 4 Innocent people, (including a child) being killed and 264 people injured by Muslim males.

No Obama, I really don’t see a pattern here to justify profiling, do you? So, to ensure we Americans never offend anyone, particularly fanatics intent on killing us, airport security screeners will no longer be allowed to profile certain people.

So, ask yourself “Just how stupid are we???”

They must conduct random searches of 80-year-old women, little kids, airline pilots with proper identification, 85-year-old Congressmen with metal hips, and Medal of Honor winner and former Governor Joe Foss, BUT……..leave Muslim Males alone lest we be guilty of profiling.

Ask yourself, “Just how stupid are we?” Have the American people completely lost their minds or just their Power of Reason???

As the writer of the award winning story ” Forrest Gump ” so aptly put it, “Stupid Is As Stupid Does.”

As OBAMA SAID IN HIS BOOK NOTHING SOUNDS SO BEAUTIFUL AS THE MUSLIM EVENING PRAYERS FROM THE TOWER.

WAKE UP AMERICA!!!

usa3.gif[National Security Presidential Directives – NSPDs]

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

ADV: My phone’s password

Governor Walker, July 18, 2016

Why is it that people refuse to force those to whom we have given our consent to govern our country
in our stead, to obey the Constitution? Is coercion and threats of violence against members and their
families so rampant that so many of them are failing to perform as expected and as they have sworn
they will behave? Something extraordinary is taking place and it had better get fixed real soon.

The most successful cure for threats and coercion is exposure. Freedom of the Press is the tool
that will get the job done. There are so many people with access to information concerning the personal
lives of those in Congress, the Administration (other than Obama and Jarrett)l, and the Supreme Court
that information needed to expose things deterring politicians from behaving as Americans. I cannot
believe that nearly every member of Congress is behaving 180 out from what their constituents were
led to expect from them.

The only resolution to the corruption and misbehavior taking place in Washington is for every American
to refuse to reelect anyone to any office in 2016. A complete turn over of every seat up for election in
2016 is the only peaceful way to resolve our problems. If Hillary is elected, unconstitutionally, there
will be civil war in America and millions will die unnecessarily.

It is about time Americans take control of their country and remind those misdirected persons now
in office that they are not to control the people, they are to listen to the people that they serve. I
guess they all have lost the fact that they are “public servants” and as such, have no voice except
that of those for whom they serve.

Hillary Clinton, or any other woman, cannot be President of the United States. The Constitution, the
foundation of our System of Laws, and law that dictates how our government is to work in plain
English, does not permit a woman to be President and in the same breath does not allow women to
hold public office. Of course, politicians ignore anything that tends to prevent them from doing what
they want to do, and they rely on American citizens not paying attention or voicing their discontent
with what is being done. Not only that, they rely on citizens thinking that since politicians hold high
office in their government that they must be trusted and expected to do what they are supposed to
do. I know that is the way people thought of them when I was younger. All communications with
them usually started with “The Honorable….”. How mistaken they were then and now.

Article II. Section 1. of the Constitution clearly dictates that only a man shall be President and that
he shall serve but one term. The second sentence of that Article and Section can not possibly
spell out the law more clearly than it does. “He shall hold his Office for the Term of four Years, ….”
At the time the Constitution was framed women had no rights to hold any office or do anything
but manage their homes and families. They did not get the right to vote until 1920, after nearly
100 years of hard fought efforts to do so.

“On August 26, 1920, the 19th Amendment to the Constitution was finally ratified, enfranchising all
American women and declaring for the first time that they, like men, deserve all the rights and
responsibilities of citizenship.

In 1923, the National Women’s Party proposed an amendment to the Constitution that prohibited all
discrimination on the basis of sex. The so-called Equal Rights Amendment has never been ratified.”
(http://www.history.com/topics/womens-history/the-fight-for-womens-suffrage)

The Supreme Court has not ruled on making women equal in status with men in all respects because
they haven’t the power to do so. An Article V. amendment is the only way that can be accomplished.

“He shall hold his Office for the Term of four Years, ….” This is law as is the entire Constitution, as
written and legally amended. The phrase “for the Term of four Years, ….” limits presidents to one
term of four years, no more. “the Term” is singular and the same as saying “one Term”.

The 22nd Amendment that purports to limit a president to two terms of four years each is a farce
and meant to take a persons focus off of Article II. Section 1. The 22nd Amendment cannot limit
a person to something he doesn’t have, so, this amendment gives a president the ability to serve
two four-year terms as well as limits him to two four-year terms. Where the authors dropped the
ball is that no mention is made, within the amendment, of Article II. Section 1. or of changes to it
made pursuant to ratification of the amendment. The 22nd Amendment is null and void because
Article II. Section 1., part of the original Constitution, has precedence.

Concerning term limits. Members of Congress are held to serving one term of the length specified
for service by the Framers in Article I. Sections 2, and 3. Section 2. concerns Members of the
House shall be chosen every second year. The word “Members” is all inclusive and the statement
means “All Members” shall be chosen “every” second year. There are no provisions for reelections
or service beyond two years provided in the Constitution.

“The House of Representatives “”shall” be composed of “Members chosen every second Year” by the
People of the several States, and the Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite
for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature.”

Section 3. concerns Members of the Senate. ” The Senate of the United States shall be composed
of two Senators from each State, chosen by the Legislature thereof, for six Years; and each Senator
shall have one Vote.” The 17th Amendment changed the wording from “chosen by the Legislature”
to “chosen by the People”. The limited period of time to be served by each Senator is “for six years.”
This is a definite statement limiting service to one period “for six years.”. There are no provisions
allowing Senators to be reelected..

The Framers wrote the Constitution on the assumption that those chosen to serve would be honest
and patriotic people. To frame the Constitution such that it provided protection from all the forms of
mischief man could get into would be impossible. Yet, they new well the weaknesses of men faced
with unguarded temptations, over time, bearing no penalties for abuse. That when they fell to those
temptations the ill-gotten gains therefrom would come to control their actions and lead to disservice
to their duties and to their constituents.

Governor, that is where our once great nation stands today. We have a government run amok of the
Constitution comprised of individuals that care not for their duties or their country but only their gains
from the temptations to which they have fallen.

The Framers provided the 2md Amendment for our use in taking back our government from those
that would exert tyranny upon us and take away the right of the People to control their country and
make slaves of us all. This is the very thing the Framers worked so hard to protect us from.

I prefer refusing to reelect anyone to open civil war. I hope you will help promote the idea when you
speak at the Republican Convention on Wednesday.

Please note, the Constitution does not provide for political parties. They are inventions of politicians
for serving politicians and amassing large amounts of money and power never intended. I think its
high time that the Constitution be honored and political parties made illegal. They are not needed.
Members of Congress are elected in the States that they are to serve. They need no national
exposure or support especially since they should serve one term and then go back home. Sufficient
information for voters to be able to choose candidates can be provided on line and in newspapers.

Presidents can be elected by enabling citizens to read and peruse facts about all candidates and
make their choice from that information. How well a candidate aligns himself with the views of
voters will determine who gets the most votes and becomes President.

Sincerely Supportive,

Joseph D. Hollinger
God Bless America, My Country tis of Thee!

On 7/17/2016 2:52 PM, Scott Walker wrote:

My phone’s password

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment