“Sharia-ism” is a Misnomer, invented by activist Joy Brighton to apparently cloud the threat Islam poses to us all.


Joy Brighton was on the Kelly File on Fox News today, pushing her book
and her misleading ideas concerning Muslims and Islam. It appears that
Brighten is trying to help move the Muslim ambition of taking control
of the whole World forward by saying that there are two groups of
Muslims. That one group is comprised of those that practice the religious
Islam and march merrily along like the rest of us. The second group
(according to Brighten) is comprised of the radical Muslims that are the
ones that carry out Jihad, perform mutilations, beheadings, stonings,
child marriages, selling of women as slaves for sex acts, preventing women
from getting educations, treating women as breed animals, and so on.
Whatever Brighton is trying to accomplish is not, in my opinion, in the
best interest of Americans to read or consider as the Gospel truth.

Brighton is entitled to write whatever book she wants. We have been
lead to believe that most authors have researched the subject of their
book from top to bottom and are extremely well versed on the subject
about which they have written. This may be the case with Ms. Brighton.
Problem is, it appears to me that she is using her knowledge to
dangerously cloud the image of the threat Islam presents to every
non-Muslim in the World. Especially, in the United States, England,
Sweden, France, Germany and the like.

This author uses apparent concrete references to show Brighton to
be erroneous in her claims thus disclosing her apparent attempt to
paint Muslims in an untrue light and Islam as a religion, which it is
not as religions are known to be in America.

The Counter Jihad Report

The Dangerous, Mindslaughtered
Fraudulence of Joy Brighton’s
“Sharia-ism”

By Andrew Bostom: May 6, 2014

Robert Conquest, the preeminent historian of Soviet Communism’s
genocidal depredations, characterized the “mental aberration” of all
varieties of Western apologists for Communism, as “mindslaughter.”

Joy Brighton

Joy Brighton

The term mindslaughter is an apposite description of what activist
Joy Brighton is currently promoting (see ) by coining
the absurd—and dangerous—idea of “Sharia-ism.” No matter how
clumsy and counterfactual her presentation, what Brighton is
attempting to foist upon uninformed audiences, i.e., “educating”
them about the alleged “difference between Islam and the political
ideology behind sharia law,” is profoundly and dangerously misleading.

From my serious compendium on the Sharia, Sharia Versus Freedom,
pp. 110-115, here is but a brief corrective to Brighton’s obfuscating
and destructive drivel: GO HERE

The Counter Jihad Report

News ~ Resources ~ Activism

Search

Main menu

Skip to primary content

Post navigation

← Previous

The Dangerous, Mindslaughtered Fraudulence of Joy Brighton’s “Sharia-ism”

Posted on May 6, 2014 by lburt

By Andrew Bostom:

Robert Conquest, the preeminent historian of Soviet Communism’s genocidal depredations, characterized the “mental aberration” of all varieties of Western apologists for Communism, as “mindslaughter.”

Joy Brighton

Joy Brighton

The term mindslaughter is an apposite description of what activist Joy Brighton is currently promoting (see ) by coining the absurd—and dangerous—idea of “Sharia-ism.” No matter how clumsy and counterfactual her presentation, what Brighton is attempting to foist upon uninformed audiences, i.e., “educating” them about the alleged “difference between Islam and the political ideology behind sharia law,” is profoundly and dangerously misleading.

From my serious compendium on the Sharia, Sharia Versus Freedom, pp. 110-115, here is but a brief corrective to Brighton’s obfuscating and destructive drivel:

**

According to the most authoritative twentieth-century Western Islamic legal scholar, Joseph Schacht (d. 1969), the sharia, or “clear path to be followed,” is the “canon law of Islam,” which “denotes all the individual prescriptions composing it.” Schacht traces the use of the term sharia to Koranic verses such as 45:18, 42:13, 42:21, and 5:48, noting an “old definition” of the sharia by the seminal Koranic commentator and early Muslim historian Tabari (d. 923), as comprising the law of inheritance, various commandments and prohibitions, and the so-called hadd punishments. These latter draconian punishments, defined by the Muslim prophet Muhammad either in the Koran or in the hadith (the canonical collections of Muhammad’s deeds and pronouncements), included: (lethal) stoning for adultery; death for apostasy; death for highway robbery when accompanied by murder of the robbery victim; for simple highway robbery, the loss of hands and feet; for simple theft, cutting off of the right hand; for “fornication,” a hundred lashes; for drinking wine, eighty lashes. As Schacht further notes, sharia ultimately evolved to become “understood [as] the totality of Allah’s commandments relating to the activities of man.” The holistic sharia, he continues, is nothing less than Islam’s quintessence, “the Sharia is the most characteristic phenomenon of Islamic thought and forms the nucleus of Islam itself.” But Schacht then delineates additional salient characteristics of the sharia which have created historically insurmountable obstacles to its reform, through our present era.

Allah’s law is not to be penetrated by the intelligence . . . i.e., man has to accept it without criticism, with its apparent inconsistencies and its incomprehen­sible decrees, as wisdom into which it is impossible to enquire [inquire]. One must not look in it for causes in our sense, nor for principles; it is based on the will of Allah which is bound by no principles, therefore evasions are consid­ered as a permissible means put at one’s disposal by Allah himself. Muslim law . . . has always been considered by its followers as some­thing elevated, high above human wisdom, and as a matter of fact human logic or system has little share in it. For this very reason, the Sharia is not “law” in the modern sense of the word, any more than it is on account of its subject matter. It comprises without restriction, as an infallible doctrine of duties the whole of the reli­gious, political, social, domestic and private life of those who profess Islam, and the activities of the tolerated members of other faiths so far as they may not be detrimental to Islam.

Elsewhere Schacht elucidates how sharia—via the uniquely Islamic institution of jihad war—regulates the relationship between Muslims and non-Muslims. These regulations make explicit the sacralized vulnerability of unvanquished non-Muslims to jihad depredations, and the permanent, deliberately humiliating legal inferiority for those who survive their jihad conquest, and incorporation into an Islamic polity governed by sharia.

The basis of the Islamic attitude towards unbelievers is the law of war; they must be either converted or subjugated or killed; the third alternative, in general, occurs only if the first are refused. As an exception, the (Arab) pagans are given the choice between conversion to Islam or death. Apart from this prisoners of war are either made slaves or killed or left alive as (free) dhimmis, or exchanged for Muslim prisoners of war, at the discretion of the imam; also a treaty of surrender is concluded which forms the legal basis for the treatment of non-Muslims to whom it applies. . . . This treaty necessarily provides for the surrender of the non-Muslims with all duties derived from it, in particular the payment of tribute, i.e., the fixed poll-tax (jizya) and the land tax (kharaj), the amount of which is determined from case to case. The non-Muslims must wear distinctive clothing and must mark their houses, which must not be built higher than those of Muslims, by distinctive signs; they must not ride horses or bear arms, and they must yield the way to Muslims; they must not scandalize the Muslims by openly performing their worship or their distinctive customs, such as drinking wine; they must not build new churches, synagogues, and hermitages; they must pay the poll-tax under humiliating conditions. It goes without saying they are excluded from the specifically Muslim privileges. . . . A non-Muslim who is not protected by a treaty is called harbi, “in a state of war,” “enemy alien”; his life and property are completely unprotected by law unless he has been given a temporary safe-conduct (aman).

Moreover, Schacht visited Nigeria between February and April 1950 and wrote the following about northern Nigeria’s efforts at rolling back British colonial law, and reintroducing the sharia:

Islamic Law has made great progress there. . . . The next ambition of the Muslim ruling class in Northern Nigeria is to continue in the same direction and seek the removal of the few restrictions which the British administration had to impose on the full application of Islamic law.

The consequences, at present, of this recrudescence of sharia in northern Nigeria—including at least intermittent application of hadd punishments—were described in a brief report published September 8, 2011.

a has sentenced two men to amputation of their right wrists for stealing a bull, with the amputation to be carried out in public if it is given final approval. The Shariah court in the village of Nassarawan Mailayi in the northern state of Zamfara on Thursday ordered that Auwalu Abubaka, 23, and Lawalli Musa, 22, have their right hands chopped off for stealing a bull worth 130,000 naira ($867; 628 euros). However, the two men have 30 days to appeal their sentence and the state governor must approve any amputation. Such sen tences have only rarely been carried out in Nigeria. “Based on the admission of guilt by the two of you of trespassing into the house . . . and stealing a bull whose worth is well above the minimum value to warrant amputation, I hereby order that each of you should have his right wrist amputated,” Judge Muhammadu Abubakar said. “I hereby order that the sentence be carried out on October 8, on market day for members of the public to witness.” The convicts were arraigned on August 8 following complaints to the police by a resident accusing them of stealing his bull from his house, which led to their arrest, court documents showed. Shariah law is in place across 12 states in predominately Muslim northern Nigeria, but it is selectively enforced. It provides for amputation of the wrist for theft and it would be the second time such a sentence is handed down in Zamfara, the first of Nigeria’s 36 states to reintroduce Shariah law after the country returned to democratic rule in 1999. In 2001, a notorious cattle rustler had his right wrist amputated fol­lowing conviction by a Shariah court in the state capital Gusau for stealing a bull after the then state governor approved the sentence.

Independently endorsing Schacht’s views, Professor Carl Brockelmann (1868–1956), the renowned scholar of Semitic languages, and arguably the foremost Orientalist of his generation, made these candid observations about the sharia’s injunctions pertaining to jihad, and penal law, in 1939—Islamic law being “valid” eternally, and all too widely applied in Brockelmann’s era, till now.­

Read more

Also see:

Share this:

Like this:

Like Loading…

Related

This entry was posted in Islam, Sharia and tagged Counter Jihad Report, Islamic Sharia law, Joy Brighton, Joy Brighton’s “Sharia-ism”, Sharia, Sharia-ism by lburt. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Enter your comment here…

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
Email (required) (Address never made public)

Name (required)

Website

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

Notify me of follow-up comments via email.

Notify me of new posts via email.

Customized Twenty Eleven Theme. | Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Follow “The Counter Jihad Report”

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,412 other followers

Powered by WordPress.com

Send to Email Address Your Name Your Email Address
loadingCancel

Post was not sent – check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.

%d bloggers like this:

Subject:
"Sharia-ism" is a Misnomer, invented by activist Joy Brighton to apparently cloud the threat Islam poses to us all.
From:
Joe Hollinger <joe_hollinger@tds.net>
Date:
07/05/2014 1:48 AM
BCC:
Amber <sparkler_17@yahoo.com>, April <miss_april_1985@yahoo.com>, Bob Ritchie <bobritchie@baybroadband.net>, Brian Hollinger <missouriguy_2001@hotmail.com>, Cathy Hooper <grammy85331@comcast.net>, Charles Swartz <cbs1652@yahoo.com>, Cole Karr <cole.karr@mail.house.gov>, Craig Coles <crseloc@comcast.net>, dAnn Berry <dberry.ahelper@yahoo.com>, "David L. Rauch" <david_rauch@mccaskill.senate.gov>, Devy <devvyk@npn.net>, Diane Franklin <"Diane.Franklin"@house.mo.gov>, Jennifer <jenn_lebpti@hotmail.com>, Jim Vinson <cvinson@nc.rr.com>, Joey <redneck_scorpio@yahoo.com>, "Jonathan V. Last" <editor@weeklystandard.com>, Julie Grace <jgracesellshomes@gmail.com>, Karen <gizdaizy@centurytel.net>, Larry Ashton <lashton@nc.rr.com>, Lowell Woodman <pfe1941@centurylink.net>, Maggie Kress <wwjd1@tds.net>, Mary Heisey <kiamom01@hotmail.com>, Mike Parson <mparson@senate.mo.gov>, Nancy <hollinge@tds.net>, Neil Cavuto <cavuto@foxnews.com>, Pam Benner <shyangel.pa@comcast.net>, Pat Larose <palarose@tds.net>, Peggy Logan <peggyl@fidnet.com>, Tom Girard <thomgira2@verizon.net>, Carolyn Kratzer <ckratzer1@comcast.net>, Chris Molendorp <chris.molendorp@house.mo.gov>, Debbie Higbee <higbee147@comcast.net>, Dilys Farney <dilysfar@rochester.rr.com>, Fox News <"Fox News">, Ike Skelton <mypoliticalmail.ike@gmail.com>, Jennifer Ritchie <jenniferann59@yahoo.com>, Joe Hollinger blog post <joehollinger.protect@blogger.com>, Kathy <"kathyc41"@verizon.net>, Larry Ashton <lashton@nc.rr.com>, Lebanon Tea Party Core Group <lebanonteaparty.coregroup@gmail.com>, Linda Lee Reeves <LReeves481@aol.com>

Joy Brighton was on the Kelly File on Fox News today, pushing her book
and her misleading ideas concerning Muslims and Islam. It appears that
Brighten is trying to help move the Muslim ambition of taking control
of the whole World forward by saying that there are two groups of
Muslims. That one group is comprised of those that practice the religious
Islam and march merrily along like the rest of us. The second group
(according to Brighten) is comprised of the radical Muslims that are the
ones that carry out Jihad, perform mutilations, beheadings, stonings,
child marriages, selling of women as slaves for sex acts, preventing women
from getting educations, treating women as breed animals, and so on.
Whatever Brighton is trying to accomplish is not, in my opinion, in the
best interest of Americans to read or consider as the Gospel truth.

Brighton is entitled to write whatever book she wants. We have been
lead to believe that most authors have researched the subject of their
book from top to bottom and are extremely well versed on the subject
about which they have written. This may be the case with Ms. Brighton.
Problem is, it appears to me that she is using her knowledge to
dangerously cloud the image of the threat Islam presents to every
non-Muslim in the World. Especially, in the United States, England,
Sweden, France, Germany and the like.

This author uses apparent concrete references to show Brighton to
be erroneous in her claims thus disclosing her apparent attempt to
paint Muslims in an untrue light and Islam as a religion, which it is
not as religions are known to be in America.

The Counter Jihad Report

The Dangerous, Mindslaughtered
Fraudulence of Joy Brighton’s
“Sharia-ism”

By Andrew Bostom: May 6, 2014

Robert Conquest, the preeminent historian of Soviet Communism’s
genocidal depredations, characterized the “mental aberration” of all
varieties of Western apologists for Communism, as “mindslaughter.”

Joy Brighton

The term mindslaughter is an apposite description of what activist
Joy Brighton is currently promoting (see ) by coining
the absurd—and dangerous—idea of “Sharia-ism.” No matter how
clumsy and counterfactual her presentation, what Brighton is
attempting to foist upon uninformed audiences, i.e., “educating”
them about the alleged “difference between Islam and the political
ideology behind sharia law,” is profoundly and dangerously misleading.

From my serious compendium on the Sharia, Sharia Versus Freedom,
pp. 110-115, here is but a brief corrective to Brighton’s obfuscating
and destructive drivel: GO HERE

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to “Sharia-ism” is a Misnomer, invented by activist Joy Brighton to apparently cloud the threat Islam poses to us all.

  1. Pingback: Federal Election Committee (FEC) Chairman Warns Conservative Media Could Become Regulated – 1st Amend Attack! | I am a Citizen Blog

I would like to read your comments about my posts.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s